7.1.2. The access party ensures that an agreement with a third party in accordance with point 5.3.2.c contains the requirement that the third party recognize that the Commonwealth is the source example provider. Reactions from the supplier countries have been positive to very positive. According to one interviewee, a trust fund would better organize benefit sharing and transaction transparency, while allowing the supplier country to reduce the cost of compliance controls. c. meet the conditions of the access party`s access permits; The results indicate a conflict of opinion between suppliers and industrial users. In terms of the distribution of benefits in which supplier countries see positive effects and minimal pressures, industrial users often see negative effects and/or heavy loads. This applies to the exchange of raw data and search results, as well as to the payment of access fees per sample and in advance. The dispute also concerns the provision of salaries and research funds, where industrial users believe that this would have a very positive effect for them and for the supplier countries, but the supplier countries do not prefer this option as much as the industrial users. The benefit-sharing trigger is another part in which the supplier countries and the majority of users disagreed. Suppliers explained that it would not be possible to obtain benefits if they are not shared at the time of access, whereas users have generally stated that, in most cases, there is no benefit that you can share at the access point, as no utilities are generated at that time. Keywords: access and sharing of benefits, Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and equitable and equitable sharing of benefits, genetic resources, natural product research, use A. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Bonn guidelines under this Convention give the parties to the Convention the responsibility to manage their biodiversity, including to ensure a fair and equitable sharing of the benefits of the use of genetic resources.
I. Reference to a calendar (or appendix) is a reference to a calendar (or appendix) to that act, including versions modified or replaced from time to time by written agreement between the parties, and it is also possible to see that both users and supplier countries are still looking for solutions to reduce transaction costs. The majority feel that several competent authorities in the same country lack clarity and increase transaction costs, while most of them facilitate access to basic research. However, some participants argued that the separation between basic and applied research is becoming increasingly complex. During interviews, users generally stated on several occasions that compliance with certain ABS laws has proven particularly difficult for non-commercial research and SMEs, as the system is very expensive for them. 7.1.1. The access party will recognize the provision of access to biological resources in Commonwealth areas in all third-party stores with respect to the activities of the R and D.C. In Part 8A of the Environmental and Biodiversity Protection Regulations 2000 (EPBC), provisions within the meaning of Section 301 of the EPBC Act. The regulations provide that access to biological resources in a Commonwealth region is in accordance with a regulatory authority, unless biological resources have been declared exempt.
An applicant for permission to access biological resources for potential commercial or commercial purposes must enter into an agreement with any ISP to distribute resource benefits. In question 2, interested parties were asked to rank options on the importance of importance. The majority of stakeholders opted for ABS frameworks to cover in situ and ex situ access, while the least favourable option indicated by the majority of stakeholders was in situ and ex situ access and access to DSI.